Tuesday, December 16, 2025
Home Blog Page 564

Tribunal Sacks Onnoghen As CJN After Declaring Him Guilty Of False Assets Declaration

0

The Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) has found Walter Onnoghen, who recently resigned as Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), guilty of false declaration of assets in breach of the provisions of the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) for public officials. 

Delivering its judgement on Thursday, the three-man panel chaired by Danladi Umar said the prosecution proved Onnoghen’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Therefore, it convicted him and removed him from office as Chief Justice of Nigeria, as Chairman of the National Judicial Council (NJC), and as Chairman of the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC).

It also said Onnoghen is to forfeit the money in his five bank domiciliary accounts that were not declared to the Nigerian Government because they were acquired illegally.

The tribunal also barred him from holding public office for the next 10 years.

from Saharareporters

Buhari replaces Kokori as NSITF Board chair

0

By Johnbosco Agbakwuru

President Buhari delivers Keynote address at the World Economic Forum on the Middle East and North Africa in Amman Jordan on 6th April 2019 The new board of the NSITF to be inaugurated today is headed by Mr Austin Enajemo-Isire.

Before now, former unionist, Frank Kokori was announced to be the Chairman of the NSITF Board before his new appointment as Chairman of the Michael Imoudu National Institute for Labour Studies, MINILS, Ilorin, Kwara State.

A statement by Rhoda Ishaku Illiya, Assistant Director, Press, Ministry of Labour and Employment, said:  “The President, Federal Republic of Nigeria, His Excellency, Muhammadu Buhari, GCON, has approved the appointment of members of the Board of the Nigeria Social Insurance Trust Fund, NSITF, a parastatal under the supervision of the Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment. “The Board is headed by Mr Austin Enajemo-Isire, a Chartered Accountant, professional Insurance Executive, and Banker.” According to the statement Mr Austin Enajemo-Isire is to serve as the Chairman and Mrs Ijeoma Orji Okonkwo to serve as Secretary. Other members are Olawale Osuolale Timothy, Dr Mohammed Yinusa, Comrade Waheed Adewale Adeyanju,  Comrade Ibrahim Khaleel, Dr Ifeoma Anyanwutaku,     Dutse, Umma Aminu (Mrs), Jasper Azutalam,  Member/Executive Director, Finance, Tijani Suleiman Member/Executive Admin, Mrs Kemi Nelson Member/Executive Director, Operations, Mr Ade Bayo Somefun    Member/Managing Director & Chief Executive “The Board is to be inaugurated today, by the Minister of Labour and Employment, Senator Chris Ngige. in the Honourable Minister’s Conference Room, 2nd Floor, Federal Secretariat, Phase 1, Abuja, at 11: 00 am.”

culled from Vanguard

Senate Passes Police Reform Bill

0



The Nigerian Senate has finally passed the Police Reform Bill, 2019 (SB. 683), during plenary earlier today.

The Senate passed the bill following the consideration of the report of the Senate Committee on Police Affairs.

The report was presented by Senator Tijjanj Kaura, while, Senator Mao Ohuabunwa seconded that the Senate considers the report of the Committee.

Senator Gbenga Ashafa said the parliament had to look at what the Bill stands for and address issues such as “welfare and the environment” in which police operatives work.

“Do they have enough for logistics? Do they have running funds to take care of fuel or even stationaries? We need to focus on the Police Trust Fund as an Intervention,” Ashafa asked.

Senate President Bukola Saraki had earlier described the bill as a very important one.

Saraki said that the bill will address how the police will be reformed.

from Nigerian Mirror

FG declares Friday, Monday, Public Holidays

0

ByFikayo Olowolagba


Lt. General Abdulrahaman Dambazau

The Federal Government has declared Friday, April 19 and Monday, April 22, Public Holidays to mark the 2019 Easter celebration.

Mrs Georgina Ehuriah, Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Interior, announced the holiday in a statement, quoting the minister on Wednesday in Abuja.

The Minister of Interior, Lt.- Gen. Abdulrahman Dambazau(Rtd), who made the declaration on behalf of the Federal Government, enjoined all Christians to emulate the exemplary attributes of Jesus Christ amongst which are tolerance, love and peaceful co-existence.

He urged all Nigerians home and abroad to use the occasion to pray for the peace, unity and progress of our great country, irrespective of diversity in religious beliefs.

Dambazau wished all Nigerians a happy and peaceful Easter celebration.

He further called on them to support the administration of President Muhammadu Buhari in its determination to take the country to the next level.

from Daily Post

2019 polls: ‘I cannot be removed’ – Buhari mocks Atiku at Election Tribunal

0

By Ifreke Inyang

President Muhammadu Buhari on Wednesday, took a swipe at his closest rival in the 2019 presidential election, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), describing his as a serial loser.

In a preliminary objection he filed to challenge the competence of a petition that Atiku lodged against his re-election on February 23, President Buhari boasted the electorate always chose him ahead of Atiku, in both inter-party or intra-party contests, using the 2014 presidential primaries the All Progressives Congress (APC), as an instance.

“The respondent further averred that at every previous instance, whether at intra-party or inter-party contests, where he and the 1st petitioner had vied, he has always been the preference of the electorate and/or delegates.

“In particular, at the primary election conducted by the 3rd respondent (APC) in 2014, to pick its presidential candidate for the 2015 election, the 1st petitioner and respondent, amongst others, were the candidates; and while the respondent polled 3,430 votes, 1st petitioner came a distant third with 954 votes,” the president stated in the process he filed before the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Abuja.

Buhari also questioned the powers of the tribunal to nullify his election victory at the poll, contending that the joint petition Atiku and the PDP entered against him was incompetent as it was based on conjectures.

Insisting that reliefs the petitioners are seeking from the tribunal were “vague, nebulous and lacking in specificity”, argued that most of the issues and grounds of the petition were not only “mutually exclusive”, but also outside the jurisdiction of the tribunal.

He contended that by virtue of section 31(5) and (6) of the Electoral Act, 2010, as amended, only the Federal High Court or High Court of a State has jurisdiction to adjudicate on some the issues, among which included the allegation that he was bereft of the requisite educational qualification.

Buhari told the tribunal that contrary to Atiku’s allegation, that he submitted false academic qualifications in the Form CF001 he used to secure clearance from the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), he said he was at the time of the election, “eminently qualified to contest the election, having not only the minimum qualification of reading up to secondary school level, but rose to the peak of his career as a General in the Nigerian Army with cognate experience and training.

“All information in the affidavit submitted by the respondent for the purpose of his election to the office of President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is true and correct, to the best of his information and knowledge”, he added.

Consequently, he maintained that all paragraphs of the petition relating to or touching on his alleged non possession of requisite educational qualification, “are liable to be struck out”.

More so, he argued that the alternative relief in the petition seeking a fresh election, was inconsistent with relief 409(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of the same petition, saying, “thus, all the reliefs in the petition are liable to be struck out.

“The entire reliefs are not justiciable, as the petitioners who claim to have scored majority of lawful votes in substantial number of States, are also questioning their own return in those States; the petitioners cannot act as petitioners and respondents in the same petition.

“By the petitioners’ pleadings, they claim to have majority of votes cast at the election in Rivers State, Bayelsa State, Akwa lbom State. Enugu State. Ebonyi State. Abin State Imo State. Delta State. Cross River State, Edo State, Anambra State, 0ndo State, Oyo State, Benue State, Plateau State, Adamawa State, Taraba State, and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja; yet, they seek an alternative and incongruous relief that the presidential election of 23rd February, 2019, be nullified and a fresh election ordered, without first praying for the nullification of election in the States where they claim to have won.”

Similarly, he argued that all portions of the petition relating to the use of Card Reader Device are liable to be struck out, same being incompetent and not rooted in any existing legislation.

He equally argued that every aspect of the petition grounded on or relating to electronic data purportedly retrieved or downloaded from INEC’s server, are also liable to be struck out, “same being incompetent and not rooted in any existing legislation”.

“That there were no incidences of corrupt practices at the election of 23rd February, 20l9, as alleged by the Petitioners; and that the declaration and return of the respondent President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is valid and in compliance with the provisions of the Constitution, the Electoral Act, and all other Laws, Rules, Guidelines and Regulations, regulating the election.

“That the election of the respondent as the elected President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is valid and was conducted in substantial compliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act.

“Contrary to paragraph 17 of the petition, the respondent states that the petitioners scored a total of 11,262,978 votes, trailing far behind the respondent who scored a total of 15,191,847 votes, with a margin of 3.328.869 votes”.

Buhari’s objection was filed through his team of lawyers led by Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN).

culled from Daily Post

CHALLENGES & PROSPECTS OF DEAF STUDENTS IN HIGHER INSTITUTIONS

0
Comrade Yusuf Kumo


 BY COMR.YUSUF KUMO

yusufkumo191@gmail.com

Before going straight in this article, let me begin with the subject matter by giving a clear definition of each concept in the subject, to critically examine the challenges confronting the concepts in the subject matter and to finally suggest some possible solutions regarding the subject matter.

The term “Deaf” has been generally referred to as inability to hear spoken words or sounds and to some extend inability to speak verbally. According to Marian Webster English Dictionary; “deaf-not having the faculty of hearing or only
partially able to hear”. However, it is worthy to note that, not all deaf are unable to speak verbally. Some of them especially those who are born as normal and become deaf later, can speak verbally similar or alike to that normal persons.
“Students”: According to Oxford Advance Learner Dictionary; – a person who is learning at a College or University or sometime at school.
Tertiary Institutions:- can simple be referred to as third level or stage relating to Education in college or University. On the other hand it is an
institutions of higher learning where various disciplines and areas of specializations are taught e.g. GSU,FUK BUK,FCE{T} etc. it is worthy to note that deaf students are different from other deaf who don’t attend schools. Where
the former are regarded as Educate/literate the latter are regarded as uneducated/illiterate and know very little or nothing about the society in
which they live, their religion, language, culture and the world around them. The former know more about the society and its current trends and issues as well as the world around them because “when the mind is liberated through Education the deaf can hear said Arthur C. Clarke. The former mostly exhibit acceptable behavior more than the later. All deaf ain’t be the same.
Deafness can affect people naturally by birth or caused by faulty or damage in the ear drum after birth or during childhood and maturity period. It comes in different way to different people. Sometime deafness could be caused by accident, loud noise, sickness, dirty things or using dirty objects to clean the ears and even blow on the ear. One deaf student told me he become deaf as a result of listening too much songs using ear piece, another deaf student told me he become deaf as result of hot slaps on his ear by his parent when he is kid, other told me it is by accidents. but in most case deafness occur naturally. I am using these examples to urge everyone to take good care of his ears to avoid losing his hearing. However some kind of deafness occurs unexpectedly that is by the wills of Almighty God and God knows the reasons.

 TYPE OF DEAF STUDENTS

It is worthy to note that all deaf are not in the same category.  Broadly speaking we have;
1. A deaf person who can’t hear but can speak/talks (Post lingual deaf person) mostly became deaf after birth /childhood

2. A deaf person cannot hear and cannot speak/talks (pre lingual deaf person mostly born as deaf or affected after birth, during childhood.
3. Those who can hear but cannot talks or partially speaks It is worthy to note that educating the pre lingual and these third category of deaf is not as easy as the post lingual deaf students why because the post lingual deaf students can speak and can
lip-read sometimes. In addition those who are born normal and become deaf later have some advantages over those who was naturally born as deaf because the former they gained some experience, norms, culture, socialization etc from
mixing with hearing counterparts before he/ she become deaf and in most case they behave as normal ones and sometimes can hardly be identified as deaf until one speaks the language they don’t understand or words they can’t lip-read. In  addition, the post lingual deaf students gained much knowledge, skills and experiences faster in term of their religion, language, culture, norm and values of our societies right from childhood when they are hearing and learn about them more at schools, home or with their peers after their become deaf. The pre lingual on the other hand, sometime find it difficult to learn the language, norms, culture, values etc. at home because they can’t hear. and most parents attention are on normal child more than the deaf children as a result of that, they often learn them at schools or mixing with peer groups and other types of secondary socialization. Sometime it is difficult to compare the prelingual and post lingual deaf because the former gained more advantage over the latter. But the latter can sometime struggle to gain more knowledge, skills and experiences than the former. it is a matter of talents, determination, hard work and confidence. Mrs. Chinyere Catherine, (a deaf lawyer and disable right advocate) has this to say “when you see a prelingual deaf person who can read and write good English and is a University graduate, please doff your hat for them. It is a big feat. They deserve medals of Honor, TRULY!
Of course it is not easy for the deaf, it’s neither a miracle, but it is a matter of confidence, hard work prayers & determination to excel and success.


CHALLENGES AND PROPECTS

Being a deaf is not the end of life but a challenge you need to overcome by believing in yourself that you can makes it no matter situation. Broadly speaking deaf students faced a number of challenges which can sometime affect their studies or hinder them from doing well in their academic, sometime it even led to self-withdrawal in school and or colleges. (I personally know some deaf that withdrawn themselves from higher tertiary institutions) However, for us to fully understand the challenges confronting the deaf students in higher tertiary institutions, we should look at the roots, causes and effects.
1. FAMILY & SOCIETAL CHALLENGES: – Life begins with the family & home’s the first place of anyone in any society. It’s worthy to note that many deaf students in Nigeria face a number of challenge from home, these challenges includes discrimination/unequal treatment, lacks of care and concerns as well as parental negligence. It is disheartening that a deaf student who, despite
his disability, struggled with patience and confidence to complete / finish his primary and secondary schools as well as secured admission to study in higher tertiary institution were still shown little concerns by their parents at home. Most parents’ attentions are on normal children because they think deaf persons could never success in life like the normal ones due to their wrong perception of the deaf and deafness. The facts is that we have many disabled and deaf who are successful, some of them are now lecturers, lawyers, Civil servants, academicians, bureaucrats, technocrats, politicians, computer wizards to mention but few. … I personally know many of them…some of whom are currently studying or working abroad some perhaps due to the discriminatory attitudes of Nigerian tertiary institutions, government and the society they perceived. Meanwhile, Hume asserts that “the distortion of disabilities may also result if a child is raised in a household that views the disabled negatively. The child will then most likely carry this negative attitude into adulthood. Most people will alter their views when they finally meet a disabled person who has established himself as a member of society, possibly with a family of his/her own. In almost all the success stories that get to the public” Hume (1990)

Although it is true that some parents of the deaf are poor, unable to support even their normal children studying in higher tertiary institutions, if they were unable to support their normal children studying in higher tertiary institutions, imagine about their deaf children? the situation could be worst for the deaf students studying in higher tertiary institutions. However, the hard fact is that some parents consider deafness as a curse rather than a blessing. Because some parents thinks a deaf person can never be somebody in life, they therefore shift attention to their normal children’s education neglecting about the deaf,  Imagine….to be frank, some of these prejudice attitudes against some the deaf people is not only discouraging and discriminatory but also a killing the future ambition of the deaf. In facts it frequently affects their academic performances. Being a deaf/disabled could be devastating for those who experience inadequate social and cultural emancipation in their state of life. The major factors which influence their impact is the age of unset, degree of severity, attitudes of parents, siblings, the community and the larger society.  There are many who are not able to talk about their disability and who do spend most of their lives feeling sorry for themselves, frustrated, and angry. From many other experiences, these feelings are also a result of what the person was taught. If a disabled person was spoiled as a child and told he/she can do nothing, then he/she will not want to do anything but feel sorry for him/herself. ~Anonymous

We are fighting for a society which celebrates difference, a society which does not react to physical, sensory or intellectual impairments, or emotional distress, with fear and with prejudice. We want a society that recognizes the difficulties we face, but which also values us for what we are.

Catherine Edeh


2. ACADEMICS/INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES:

 In fact, many normal people wonders how can a deaf who can’t hear the lectures cope with his/her academic studies in a school where there is neither special education nor interpreters… this is the frequent question I am asked by normal
counterparts when I first got admission in tertiary institution. Funny enough, I was doing well and always moving forward right from the beginning of my academic journey. I thank the lord for seeing me through regardless……I always believe it’s a matter of hard work, prayers and determination to excel/success. However, deaf students in any tertiary institutions normally face challenges with within the tertiary institution itself. the challenges could be as a result of discrimination from colleague and or staff,  lack of course materials and other written document (which the deaf solely depend for their studies,) another challenges is lack of interpreters ,Interpreter is a person who can turn/translate spoken languages into sign language and finger spelling ,haven’t you ever saw one? When there is interpreters the deaf
learn faster than when there is not unfortunately, majority of our higher tertiary institutions especially in the north, don’t care about hiring an interpreter for the deaf students studying in their institutions… in fact some deaf students told me that, if the deaf dare complain to their institutions that they don’t understands the lecturers and need an interpreter, some of the institutions will say, we don’t have special education here other will say why don’t you apply FCE Special Oyo, Unijos or Unilorin where there are special education and many interpreter available? (I personally know an institution that deregistered a student when they realized she is a deaf. It was after tough legal battle that they readmitted her. Thank to human and disability right activists and advocates, I also know one college that threatened to withdraw their deaf students or send them to special education FCE Oyo, thanks to intervention of deaf elders, leaders and their concerned lecturers who have confidence in them and oppose the decisions of the staffs. I also know one college in the north that said they can’t admit any deaf student anymore because of poor academic performance they saw from one deaf present in their college, what a misconception about the deaf. Some people thinks that all of us are the same in manner, intellectual and talents, no that’s misjudgments. We ain’t be the same. Even identical twins ain’t be same in everything.) Meanwhile some institutions will just advise them to apply for a transfer into the tertiary institutions they know that there is interpreters. Imagine, how can some deaf from poor or neglected by family afford to go and studies in these distant and expensive institutions? It’s also against their preferences, not all of us want to study special education, and if we apply in some institutions like FCE OYO and Unijos, it’s compulsory that we should study special education even if we applied for only B.Sc. Sociology, Political science or Economics, special education is a must, which is somehow against our preference, that’s why some of us don’t want to study there because our preferences is not respected there, they thinks that once you have disability you should study special education even if you don’t want to .. which is not right…just as Meekosha argued that, Negative perception about persons with disabilities and their subsequent placement in confined institutions, increased their exclusion from mainstream society, thus limiting their ability to integrate in society and make their voices heard on national issues (Meekosha,1999).) …in addition, lack of cooperation and information about tests, assignments, tutorials and other academics activities as well as discrimination and seclusion from colleagues is a major challenge discouraging deaf students in higher tertiary institutions in fact, Prejudice, discrimination, services which disempower and segregate us, a failure to use resources to create accessible environments and technology to aid communication – these are the disabling barriers that we experience. ‘My impairment is the fact that I can’t speak; my disability is the fact that you won’t take the time and trouble to learn how to communicate with me’ ~one person with hearing disability


3. GOVERNMENT:- The duty of government is to support and empower especially the most vulnerable…to ensure it provide meaningful way of life to every citizens of its states, to support and encourage particularly less privileged members of the society in order to see they achieve their hidden potential and achieve their goals, but unfortunately most level of government fails take its responsibilities. When parents and society fail to support and encourage deaf education it is duty of government to support and empower them, educationally, them but in most case the government at all level has shown little or no concern toward deaf education. It is worthy to note that in other countries deaf/ disabled education is free and compulsory but here in our society it is not/never, no matter which kind of disability affect you, you must pay not even 50% of the amount for school fees, but full amount. It is only few states and very few institutions in Nigeria where deaf/disabled students are required to pay 50% of the total amount for registration. Government is supposed to do something about this; deaf and disabled are the most vulnerable who need special consideration. Even the scholarship, not all of them are  paid reasonable amount without any bonus despite their disability and the most disheartening is, when they successfully graduated most of them are denied jobs by government official just because they can’t hear. As Obani observed, Many who succeed in completing their primary and secondary school education, vocational or technical education, do not have equal job opportunities available to them (Obani, 2006).

This is not only discriminatory but also pathetic. Give them chance in their area of specialization and see if they can’t. Belief me a deaf workers is a good workers. They will surely contribute a lot in the rapid growth and development of their place of work if given special consideration.  The focus of our civil rights movement is therefore on society; it is not on us as individuals. The issue is not our impairments, but the extent to which our society is an integrated one, the extent of social exclusion. We ask, not what disabled people can or cannot do, but what society can do to tackle the barriers to inclusion~ Jean Morris. He further added that, “The qualities of our lives, our life chances, are not inevitably determined by what our bodies can’t do or look like or how our minds function. Like the women’s movement, we say – biology is not destiny. If I could not get a job that would be because of discrimination, not because I can’t walk or because I’m a woman” The government should also provide strategies that will lead to attitude change in the society such as Bills/Laws protecting the rights of persons with disabilities. (Disability Bill)


PROSPECTS AND RECOMMENDATION

Due to time & space, I have to summarize the prospective and recommendations. First & foremost, families should try to understand deaf child and treat them equal
without any form of discrimination. Kindly support them, encourage them, motivate them and belief me they will perform very well in their academic excel and will be great God willing. They will be successful if not very successful at the end. Secondly, the society has its responsibility; the society should encourage deaf education through various support programmes and mutual understanding without comparing them with the uneducated & deaf beggars. they are quite different. Thirdly the institutions should try all it can do to ensure course materials and written documents are available for deaf students to cope. In addition, guidance and counseling by lecturers as well as hiring an interpreter for them when necessary is important. the lecturers and staff should be ready & willing to hear their complaints as most are due to lack of course materials in addition they should be properly informed about lecturers, tests, assignments etc. and finally the government has a great role to play. If the govt cannot make deaf education free and compulsory like in other countries including Africans, why not make it half free and compulsory? I mean why not making it 50% free but compulsory when it is completely free and compulsory in many countries including some in African? The government should know that deaf/disabled people are
special people who deserve special consideration, any society that neglects disabled education and welfare, the result is; Mendicancy, which speak ill of the society in the midst of foreigners.

In conclusion, I’m urging parents of the deaf, the society, the governments at all levels, non-governmental organization and philanthropists to please encourage deaf education like the way they are mostly encouraging girl child education.
Mind you being a deaf is not a barrier to education. the only barrier is discrimination, parental and societal negligence towards deaf
and disabled education. “We are fighting for a society which celebrates difference, a society which does not react to physical, sensory or intellectual impairments, or emotional distress, with fear and with prejudice. We want a society that recognizes the difficulties we face, but which also values us for what we are” ~J. Morris

 “It is the individual who is not interested in his follow men who has the greatest difficulties in life and provides the greatest injury to others, it’s from among such individuals that all human failures spring” –Alfred Adler.
(COMRADE YUSUF KUMO is a deaf graduate of political science and a Pioneer President, Gombe State Deaf Students Association, GSU Chapter. Wrote in from Gombe)

Jigawa doles out N4bn to people with disabilities

0

Jigawa state Governor, Muhammad Badaru

The Jigawa State Rehabilitation Board says it has paid N4 billion Social Security Allowance to no fewer than 4,050 Persons Living With Disabilities (PLWDAs) in the state.

The Jigawa State Rehabilitation Board says it has paid N4 billion Social Security Allowance to no fewer than 4,050 Persons Living With Disabilities (PLWDAs) in the state.

Alhaji Ibrahim Raba-Kaya, the board’s Executive Secretary, made the disclosure at the formal launch of the State Social Protection and State Food and Nutrition Policies in Dutse on Tuesday.

“From 2007 to date, we’ve spent not less than N4 billion to pay monthly social security allowance to persons with disabilities in the state.

“We have 150 registered beneficiaries in each of the 27 Local Government Areas that receive N7,000 each monthly.

“And the programme is still ongoing,” he said.

He explained that the programme was introduced by the government to reduce hardship being experienced by PLWDAs in the state.

culled from PM NEWS

Healthcare providers accuse HMOs of high indebtedness, impunity

0

By Angela Onwuzoo 

…List way forward for NHIS

To  realise the objective of the National Health Insurance Scheme  in  making quaulity health care available to Nigerians at an affordable cost, healthcare providers  in the country, under the aegis of Health Care Providers Association of Nigeria, have  listed grey areas  requiring urgent  government attention  for the scheme to move  forward .

The healthcare providers decried  the irregularities in the operations of  some Health Maintenance Organisations in the health insurnace industry, while accusing them of impunity and failure to pay providers their capitation fees,  which they said were running into millions of naira.

Speaking at a press briefing in Lagos recently, President of HCPAN, Dr. Arigbabuwo Adeyeye, blamed the poor performance of the NHIS on weak and politicised leadership of  the scheme, which he said was responsible for low uptake and  less  than five per cent coverage  since the  establishment of the scheme over 12 years ago.

Following recent alleged corruption charges  rocking the leadership of the scheme, the Federal Government ordered its  Executive Secretary, Prof. Usman Yusuf, to proceed on an administrative leave pending the outcome of  a seven-man panel set up  to investigate the allegations levelled against him by the scheme’s Governing
Council.

Adeyeye also  Identified absence of enrollees in most facilities, skyrocketing out of pocket payment, high morbidity and mortality rate in Nigeria, poor funding, low NHIS awareness in the communities, lack of information technology infrastructure at health facilities as well as  poor distribution of enrollees as some of the factors that have hindered the growth of the  Nigerian health insurance scheme.

Besides, he noted that the failure of the Federal Government to make health insurance compulsory for every Nigerian  also contributed to the slow pace of success in the scheme.

Giving insight into activities of some  of the HMOs, which he said were totally unacceptable to HCPAN, Adeyeye said, “The instability and impunity of some HMOs, with most of them owing providers for several months,  is a affecting the health sector.

“We are now experiencing a deliberate insolvency by some HMOs and bailing out with providers’ funds running into several millions of naira, for instance, THEBE,KBL, Premium Health, et cetera.”

He also frowned at the attitude of  the teaching hospitals, saying they have taken over the bulk of the enrollees and primary cases , thereby making them unable to adequately attend to referral cases, training and research for which they were established.

The HCPAN President is also not happy that the state-supported health insurance is emphasising more on primary care while neglecting secondary care provision/ accreditation by
providers .

On the way forward, Adeyeye called on the Federal Government  to make  the scheme compulsory  in order for everyone to come on board, adding that when everybody enrolls into  the scheme, it will promote efficiency  and  proper utilisation of the health facilities and ultimately better health care delivery system in the country.

The NHIS was established by the Federal Government in 2005 to enable Nigerians enjoy easy access to health care services.

Stressing  the need for the NHIS Act to be amended accordingly, the HCPAN leader  also asked  the government to stop tertiary institutions from  attending to primary cases and receiving capitation.

He further said : “Tariff must be reviewed and done regularly to reflect the economic realities in the country. HMOs must be made to pay providers as and when due. There should be equity in the distribution of
enrollees.

Providers must be given a minimum of enrollees necessary to break even. Providers should improve on their IT infrastructure because it will serve to improve keeping of data. There should be public enlightenment in the various communities  to improve awareness of NHIS by all stakeholders.”

People with albinism face multiple forms of discrimination worldwide

0

by Muyiwa Abegunde

Albinism is still profoundly misunderstood, socially and medically. The physical appearance of persons with albinism is often the object of erroneous beliefs and myths influenced by superstition, which foster their marginalization and social exclusion. This leads to various forms of stigma and discrimination.

In some communities, erroneous beliefs and myths, heavily influenced by superstition, put the security and lives of persons with albinism at constant risk. These beliefs and myths are centuries old and are present in cultural attitudes and practices around the world.

On 18 December 2014, the General Assembly adopted a resolution proclaiming, with effect from 2015, 13 June as International Albinism Awareness Day.

The United Nations Human Rights Council adopted a resolution in 2013 calling for the prevention of attacks and discrimination against persons with albinism. Moreover, in response to the call from civil society organizations advocating to consider persons  with albinism as a specific group with particular needs that require special attention, on 26 March 2015, the Council created  the mandate of Independent Expert on the enjoyment of human rights by persons with albinism.

In January 2016, Ms. Ikponwosa Ero, United Nations Independent Expert on the Enjoyment of Human Rights of Persons with Albinism submitted her first report on albinism to the UN Human Rights Council. Adding to the information contained in the July 2016 report to the General Assembly, the latest report was presented to the Human Rights Council in 2017 and included a focus on witchcraft as a key root cause of attacks against persons with albinism.

Disabilities Act: Stakeholders to engage NGOs, MDAs on domestication

0

by DIANA OMUEZA

Uyo (Akwa-Ibom) April 11, 2019 Stakeholders in the fight for the implementation of Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities Prohibition Act say they are set to engage other stakeholders on domestication of the Act.

The stakeholders said they would engage NGOs, Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) for the domestication of the Act at Federal and State levels.

They said this at the 2nd day of a Three-Day Strategic Planning summit on the Implementation of Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities Prohibition Act stakeholders’ consultative meeting in Uyo, Akwa Ibom on Thursday.

The News Agency of Nigeria reports that the summit was organised by the Centre for Citizens with Disabilities (CCD) with the support of Open Society Initiative for West Africa (OSIWA), an NGO.

Mr David Anyaele, Executive Director of CCD, noted that Nigerians along with stakeholders, NGOs, and relevant MDAs had the sole responsibility of pushing for the full implementation of the Act.

According to him, non-implementation of the Act signifies that Persons with Disabilities (PWDs) will remain disenfranchised from infrastructure and other basic amenities that can alleviate their plights and sufferings despite the Act.

“PWDs will remain vulnerable and limited to all sorts of victimisation without proper implementation of the Act at all levels of government.

“Effective solutions require strategy formulations, procedures, and structuring to ensure full and active implementation of the law.

“Therefore, partnering, collaborating and synergysing with other NGOs and disability stakeholders is the best approach, with the help of governments, donors, disabilities communities, and families of PWDs,’’ Anyaele said.

The CCD director noted that the implementation of the Act would also ensure that PWDs were not marginalised in the society.

Mr Lawrence Idemudia, Senior Social Welfare Officer, Ministry of Women Affairs, said that the Act would be implemented, if disability group did not relent in engaging stakeholders through advocacy and campaigns.

Mr Felix Okpara, Director of Rehabilitation, Ministry of Strategy and Social Development, Abia,  said that the Act needed not be over-flogged, as the issues surrounding disability were too huge and numerous to be ignored or waved aside.

He advised PWDs not to relent in the struggle to achieve successful implementation of the law, adding that it was for their benefit.

Mr Damilare Atunwa, a Volunteer with CCD said that government, stakeholders, NGOs and Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) must work with traditional and religious leaders for speedy adoption of the law and fully implementation.

Atunwa, a person with disability, said that involving such leaders in the implementation would ensure easy elimination of that cultural, language and religious barriers.

NAN reports that participants at the meeting include officials of the Lagos State Office of Disability Affairs (LASODA) Officials of Ministry of Women Affairs.

Others are officials of Ministry of Strategy and Social Development, Representatives of various disabilities groups, Sign Language Interpreters for the Deaf, as well as other persons with disabilities.